Bible Commentary

Deuteronomy 25:7-10

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:7-10

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

If the man refused to marry the widow of his deceased brother, he was free to do so; but the woman had her redress. She was to bring the matter before the eiders of the town, sitting as magistrates at the gate, and they were to summon the man and speak to him, and if he persisted in his refusal, the woman was to take his shoe from off his foot, and spit before his face, and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house. The taking off of the shoe of the man by the woman was an act of indignity to him; it amounted to a declaration that he was not worthy to stand in his brother's place, and was scornfully rejected by the woman herself. As the planting of the shod foot on a piece of property, or the casting of the shoe over a field, was emblematical of taking possession of it with satisfaction (; ); and as the voluntary handing of one's shoe to another betokened the giving up to that other of some property or right; so, contrariwise, the forcible removal from one of his shoe and the casting of it aside indicated contemptuous rejection of the owner, and repudiation of all his rights and claims in the matter. To walk barefooted was regarded by the Jews as ignominious and miserable (cf. , ; ). The spitting before the face of the man ( בְּפָנַיו in front of him) is by the Jewish interpreters understood of spitting on the ground in his presence. This seems to be what the words express (cf. ; ; ; ; , for the rendering of בפני); and this, according to Oriental notions, would be insult enough (cf. ; ; Niebuhr, ' Description de l'Arabie,' 1.49).

But though the childless widow might thus approach and lay hold on the man, no license was thus granted to women to pass beyond the bounds of decency in their approaches to the other sex. Hence the prohibition in these verses. The severe sentence here prescribed was by the rabbins commuted into a fine of the value of the hand.

Recommended reading

More for Deuteronomy 25:7-10

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:1-19Deuteronomy 25:1-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION LAWS RELATING TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT, LEVIRATE MARRIAGES, AND WEIGHTS AND MEASURES.Matthew Henry on Deuteronomy 25:5-12Deuteronomy 25:5-12 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe custom here regulated seems to have been in the Jewish law in order to keep inheritances distinct; now it is unlawful.Marriage of a Brother's Wife. (b. c. 1451.)Deuteronomy 25:5-12 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleMARRIAGE OF A BROTHER'S WIFE. (B. C. 1451.) Here is, I. The law settled concerning the marrying of the brother's widow. It appears from the story of Judah's family that this had been an ancient usage (Genesis 38:8), for…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10Deuteronomy 25:5-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe levitate law. At the root of this law, which obtained widely in the East, we find ideas and feelings such as these— I. RESPECT FOR THE HONOR OF THE FAMILY. In the East, as is well known, childlessness is reckoned a…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10Deuteronomy 25:5-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe rights of the firstborn. We have already observed that the firstborn had a right to a double share of the family inheritance (Deuteronomy 21:17). We have before us another of his rights—a seed was to be raised up un…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10Deuteronomy 25:5-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryLevirate marriages. If a man who was married died without issue, his surviving brother was required to marry the widow, so as to raise up a successor to the deceased, who should be his heir. The brother who refused this…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:1-19EXPOSITION LAWS RELATING TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT, LEVIRATE MARRIAGES, AND WEIGHTS AND MEASURES.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Deuteronomy 25:5-12The custom here regulated seems to have been in the Jewish law in order to keep inheritances distinct; now it is unlawful.Matthew HenrycommentaryMarriage of a Brother's Wife. (b. c. 1451.)MARRIAGE OF A BROTHER'S WIFE. (B. C. 1451.) Here is, I. The law settled concerning the marrying of the brother's widow. It appears from the story of Judah's family that this had been an ancient usage (Genesis 38:8), for…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10The rights of the firstborn. We have already observed that the firstborn had a right to a double share of the family inheritance (Deuteronomy 21:17). We have before us another of his rights—a seed was to be raised up un…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10The levitate law. At the root of this law, which obtained widely in the East, we find ideas and feelings such as these— I. RESPECT FOR THE HONOR OF THE FAMILY. In the East, as is well known, childlessness is reckoned a…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10Levirate marriages. If a man who was married died without issue, his surviving brother was required to marry the widow, so as to raise up a successor to the deceased, who should be his heir. The brother who refused this…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 25:5-10Family honor to be maintained. This law supposes a state of society and a kind of public opinion which does not now exist, and in detail it is therefore obsolete. But the principle it involves is clear, viz. that in mar…Joseph S. Exell and contributors