Bible Commentary

Esther 3:1-6

Matthew Henry on Esther 3:1-6

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

Mordecai refused to reverence Haman. The religion of a Jew forbade him to give honours to any mortal man which savoured of idolatry, especially to so wicked a man as Haman. By nature all are idolaters; self is our favourite idol, we are pleased to be treated as if every thing were at our disposal.

Though religion by no means destroys good manners, but teaches us to render honour to whom honour is due, yet by a citizen of Zion, not only in his heart, but in his eyes, such a vile person as Haman was, is contemned, Ps 15:4.

The true believer cannot obey edicts, or conform to fashions, which break the law of God. He must obey God rather than man, and leave the consequences to him. Haman was full of wrath. His device was inspired by that wicked spirit, who has been a murderer from the beginning; whose enmity to Christ and his church, governs all his children.

Recommended reading

More for Esther 3:1-6

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Haman's Malignant Proposal. (b. c. 510.)Esther 3:1-6 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleHAMAN'S MALIGNANT PROPOSAL. (B. C. 510.) Here we have, I. Haman advanced by the prince, and adored thereupon by the people. Ahasuerus had lately laid Esther in his bosom, but she had no such interest in him as to get he…The Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1-6Esther 3:1-6 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION MORDECAI, BY WANT OF RESPECT, OFFENDS HAMAN, AHASUERUS' CHIEF MINISTER. HAMAN, IN REVENGE, RESOLVES TO DESTROY THE ENTIRE NATION OF THE JEWS (Esther 3:1-6). A break, probably of some years, separates Esther 2…The Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1Esther 3:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryAfter these things. Probably some years after—about b.c. 476 or 475. Haman, the son of Hammedatha. "Haman" is perhaps Umanish, the Persian equivalent of the Greek Eumenes. "Hammedatha" has been explained as "given by th…The Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1Esther 3:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe wicked exalted. The temporary favourite of Ahasuerus was unworthy of the position to which he was raised, and the power with which he was intrusted. History has preserved the record of no meaner, baser character tha…The Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1-6Esther 3:1-6 · The Pulpit CommentaryFoolish pride and wild resentment. The lesson of this portion of the narrative is one concerning human sin. In some places Scripture seems to depict the character and the conduct of sinners in such a way as to impress t…
commentaryHaman's Malignant Proposal. (b. c. 510.)HAMAN'S MALIGNANT PROPOSAL. (B. C. 510.) Here we have, I. Haman advanced by the prince, and adored thereupon by the people. Ahasuerus had lately laid Esther in his bosom, but she had no such interest in him as to get he…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1The wicked exalted. The temporary favourite of Ahasuerus was unworthy of the position to which he was raised, and the power with which he was intrusted. History has preserved the record of no meaner, baser character tha…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1-6EXPOSITION MORDECAI, BY WANT OF RESPECT, OFFENDS HAMAN, AHASUERUS' CHIEF MINISTER. HAMAN, IN REVENGE, RESOLVES TO DESTROY THE ENTIRE NATION OF THE JEWS (Esther 3:1-6). A break, probably of some years, separates Esther 2…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1After these things. Probably some years after—about b.c. 476 or 475. Haman, the son of Hammedatha. "Haman" is perhaps Umanish, the Persian equivalent of the Greek Eumenes. "Hammedatha" has been explained as "given by th…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:1-6Foolish pride and wild resentment. The lesson of this portion of the narrative is one concerning human sin. In some places Scripture seems to depict the character and the conduct of sinners in such a way as to impress t…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:2All the king's servants. Literally, "the king's slaves"—the lower officers of the court, porters and others, of about the same rank as Mordecai. Bowed and reverenced Haman. i.e. prostrated themselves before him in the u…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:2The perfection of steadfastness. "But Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence." This book of Esther abounds in revelation of human nature. It has been much remarked upon as not containing the name of God. Furthermore,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Esther 3:2-5Contrasts. Haman was not allowed to enjoy his high and ill-gotten position without trouble. Almost at the outset it brought him an annoyance which led to tragical results. In connection with this check to the triumph of…Joseph S. Exell and contributors