Bible Commentary

Ruth 3:15-17

The Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:15-17

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Generosity.

Boaz was "a mighty man of wealth," and Naomi and Ruth were poor, widowed, friendless, and comparatively strangers. All through the narrative Boaz appears as thoughtful, liberal, unselfish, honorable, munificent. He is an example to those whom Providence has endowed with wealth.

I. WEALTH IS GIVEN TO THE RICH not for their own sake only, but FOR THE SAKE OF OTHERS. Men are not the owners, but the stewards, of their possessions. How imperfectly this truth is recognized! The only way in which we can give to Christ is by giving to his people.

II. GENEROSITY SHOULD BE PROPORTIONATE TO THE MEANS OF THE GIVER. Both his means absolutely and his means relatively, i.e. considering the claims upon him by virtue of his family, his position, &c.

III. GENEROSITY SHOULD BE PROPORTIONATE TO THE NEEDS OF THE RECIPIENT. Those should have the preference who are old, crippled, and helpless; the widow and the orphan.

IV. GENEROSITY SHOULD BE UNOSTENTATIOUS AND SYMPATHETIC in its spirit; Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth." Hardness of manner may spoil beneficence. "Rich gifts wax poor when givers prove unkind."—T.

Recommended reading

More for Ruth 3:15-17

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:1-18Naomi's maternal solicitude. This is one of those paragraphs of Scripture which require delicate handling, but which, for that very reason, are full of suggestiveness that comes home to the bosom. Under strange, old-fas…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:1-18EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Ruth 3:14-18Ruth had done all that was fit for her to do, she must patiently wait the event. Boaz, having undertaken this matter, would be sure to manage it well. Much more reason have true believers to cast their care on God, beca…Matthew HenrycommentaryRuth Sent Back in Peace to Naomi. (b. c. 1312.)RUTH SENT BACK IN PEACE TO NAOMI. (B. C. 1312.) We are here told, I. How Ruth was dismissed by Boaz. It would not have been safe for her to go home in the dead of the night; therefore she lay at his feet (not by his sid…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:15And he said, Allow me the wrapper which is upon thee, and hold on by it; and she held on by it; and he measured six measures of barley; and he put it on her, and went to the city. The expression "Allow me," literally, "…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:15He wished that Naomi might have some tangible evidence of his satisfaction.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:16The question Who art thou? sprang from Naomi's hope that the entire scheme would issue in success.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ruth 3:16And she went to her mother-in-law. And she said, Who art thou, my daughter? And she narrated to her all that the man had done to her. The question, "Who art thou, my daughter?" is not put by Naomi, as Drusius supposes,…Joseph S. Exell and contributors