Bible Commentary

Job 9:33

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:33

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Neither is there any daysman betwixt us; literally 'judge' or arbitrator called a "daysman," since he appoints the day on which the arbitration is to come off. The LXX. renders by μεσίτης, "mediator."

That might lay his hand upon us bosh. Moderate between us, that is; keep us both in cheek; assert an authority to which we must both submit.

Recommended reading

More for Job 9:33

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35Job 9:1-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35Job 9:1-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryJob, in answer to Bildad, admits the truth of his arguments, but declines to attempt the justification which can alone entitle him to accept the favourable side of Bildad's alternative. Man cannot absolutely justify him…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:21-35Job 9:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryJob to Bildad: 4. The cries of a desparing soul. I. MAINTAINING HIS INNOCENCE. 1. Attested by his conscience. "Though I were perfect;" or, better, "I am guiltless" (verse 21). Before God Job did not claim to be absolute…Matthew Henry on Job 9:25-35Job 9:25-35 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryWhat little need have we of pastimes, and what great need to redeem time, when it runs on so fast towards eternity! How vain the enjoyments of time, which we may quite lose while yet time continues! The remembrance of h…Matthew Henry on Job 9:25-35Job 9:25-35 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJob here grows more and more querulous, and does not conclude this chapter with such reverent expressions of God's wisdom and justice as he began with. Those that indulge a complaining humour know not to what indecencie…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:25-35Job 9:25-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryMelancholy reflections. I. SELF-CONTEMPLATION IN REFERENCE TO THE PAST. His life has sped swiftly—like a courier, or the swift boat of the Euphrates or the Nile, or the swooping eagle (Job 9:25, Job 9:26), and without s…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35Job, in answer to Bildad, admits the truth of his arguments, but declines to attempt the justification which can alone entitle him to accept the favourable side of Bildad's alternative. Man cannot absolutely justify him…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:21-35Job to Bildad: 4. The cries of a desparing soul. I. MAINTAINING HIS INNOCENCE. 1. Attested by his conscience. "Though I were perfect;" or, better, "I am guiltless" (verse 21). Before God Job did not claim to be absolute…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Job 9:25-35What little need have we of pastimes, and what great need to redeem time, when it runs on so fast towards eternity! How vain the enjoyments of time, which we may quite lose while yet time continues! The remembrance of h…Matthew HenrycommentaryMatthew Henry on Job 9:25-35Job here grows more and more querulous, and does not conclude this chapter with such reverent expressions of God's wisdom and justice as he began with. Those that indulge a complaining humour know not to what indecencie…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:25-35Melancholy reflections. I. SELF-CONTEMPLATION IN REFERENCE TO THE PAST. His life has sped swiftly—like a courier, or the swift boat of the Euphrates or the Nile, or the swooping eagle (Job 9:25, Job 9:26), and without s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:33The Mediator. The object desired by Job—and here he speaks for all sinful ones—is to obtain reconciliation with Jehovah, against whom he acknowledges himself to have sinned. He cries for a mediator, an arbiter, an umpir…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:33The Daysman. Job regarded it as unfair that his Judge and his Accuser should be one and the same Person, and he craved an umpire to come between. As a matter of fact, he was mistaken. His accuser was not his Judge. Sata…Joseph S. Exell and contributors