Bible Commentary

Ecclesiastes 10:16

The Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a child! "Child" is naar, which term included any age up to manhood. Some interpret the word here, as παῖς in Greek, in the sense of "slave," contrasting it with "the son of nobles" in the following verse.

But it can hardly signify more than servitor, attendant; and in the antithesis to "prince" is ebed, not naar. The child in the present case is a youthful, inexperienced ruler, who does not realize his responsibilities, and is the tool of evil advisers.

What particular instance, if any, Koheleth had in view it is impossible to say. Of course, many expositors see a reference to Rehoboam. whom, at forty years of age, his own son Abijah calls naar (), and who was certainly childish in his conduct ().

Hitzig connects the passage with the reign of Ptolemy Epiphanes, who was but five years old at the death of his father, B.C. 205, the reins of government being assumed by Agathocles and his sister Agathoclea, who occasioned serious disasters to the laud.

To support this opinion, the date of our book has to be considerably reduced (see Introduction). It is best to take the gnome as a general expression, like that in , "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them."

Thy princes eat in the morning. Eating here implies feasting and banqueting, beginning the day with sensual enjoyment instead of such honest work as attending to state matters, administering justice, etc; as becomes good rulers.

None but profligates would thus spend the early morning. "These are not drunken, as ye suppose; seeing it is but the third hour of the day," says St. Peter, repudiating the charge of intoxication ().

"Woe unto them," cries Isaiah (), "that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink!" Even the heathen censured such debauchery. Cicero thus abuses Antonius: "At quam multos dies in ea villa turpissime es per-bacchatus.

Ab hora tertia bibebatur, ludebatur, vomebatur" ('Philipp.,' 2.41). Curtius (5. 7. 2) reprehends "de die convivia inire."

Recommended reading

More for Ecclesiastes 10:16

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:1-20Ecclesiastes 10:1-20 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20Ecclesiastes 10:16-20 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe happiness of a land depends on the character of its rulers. The people cannot be happy when their princes are childish, and lovers of pleasure. Slothfulness is of ill consequence both to private and public affairs.…Mutual Duties of Princes and SubjectsEcclesiastes 10:16-20 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleMUTUAL DUTIES OF PRINCES AND SUBJECTS. Solomon here observes, I. How much the happiness of a land depends upon the character of its rulers; it is well or ill with the people according as the princes are good or bad. 1.…The Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20Ecclesiastes 10:16-20 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe picture of a happy land. I. A NOBLE KING. 1. Of royal blood. "Happy art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles"—like Horace's "Macenas atavis edite regibus," descended from a long line of crowned heads. If…The Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-17Ecclesiastes 10:16-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryStatesmanship. It is sometimes assumed that moral qualities are unimportant in relation to political affairs. If a king be brave in his warlike expeditions, splendid in his court, and affable in his demeanor; if a state…The Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20Ecclesiastes 10:16-20 · The Pulpit CommentaryDuties of rulers and subjects. Some of the evils of life arise from errors and follies which may be corrected by diligence and prudence, and among them are the caprices of unworthy princes, the vices of courtiers, and t…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:1-20EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20The happiness of a land depends on the character of its rulers. The people cannot be happy when their princes are childish, and lovers of pleasure. Slothfulness is of ill consequence both to private and public affairs.…Matthew HenrycommentaryMutual Duties of Princes and SubjectsMUTUAL DUTIES OF PRINCES AND SUBJECTS. Solomon here observes, I. How much the happiness of a land depends upon the character of its rulers; it is well or ill with the people according as the princes are good or bad. 1.…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20Duties of rulers and subjects. Some of the evils of life arise from errors and follies which may be corrected by diligence and prudence, and among them are the caprices of unworthy princes, the vices of courtiers, and t…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20The picture of a happy land. I. A NOBLE KING. 1. Of royal blood. "Happy art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles"—like Horace's "Macenas atavis edite regibus," descended from a long line of crowned heads. If…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-20Section 15. Koheleth returns to the theme mentioned in Ecclesiastes 10:4-7. and speaks of folly in one who holds the position of king, and the need of wisdom and prudence in the subjects of an unworthy ruler.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:16-17Statesmanship. It is sometimes assumed that moral qualities are unimportant in relation to political affairs. If a king be brave in his warlike expeditions, splendid in his court, and affable in his demeanor; if a state…Joseph S. Exell and contributors