Bible Commentary

Matthew 5:21

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Ye have heard ( ἠκούσατε, frequentative aorist). Our Lord does not say, "ye have read" (cf. ), for he was not now speaking to the learned classes, but to a large audience many of whom were probably unable to read. "Ye have heard," i.e. from your teachers whose teaching claims to be the substance of the Law. So, probably, even in , where the multitude say that they "have heard out of the Law that the Christ abideth for ever," which, since this is hardly expressed in so many words in the Old Testament, must mean that the instructions they have received on this subject truly represent the substance of its teaching. So here our Lord says, "You have heard from your teachers (cf. ) that the substance of the sixth commandment is so-and-so." It is thus quite intelligible that in some of these utterances there should be found added to (, ) or intermingled with () the words of a passage of Scripture, other words which are either taken from Scripture, but from another place in it (perhaps ), or do not occur in Scripture at all, but merely help to form a compendious statement of a definite interpretation (here and ). It must remain doubtful whether our Lord himself formulated these statements of the popular teaching, or quoted them verbally as current. If the latter, as is perhaps more likely, there remains the at present still more insoluble question whether they were only oral or (cf. the case of the 'Didaehe') had already been committed to writing. That it was said by them of old time ( ὅτι ἐῤῥέθη τοῖς ἀρχαίοις). By; Revised Version, to. Similarly . Although "by" may be defended, "to" (Wickliffe and Tyndale downwards) is certainly right, because

(a) it is the common usage with a passive verb;

(b) it is the constant usage with ἐῤῥέθη in the New Testament (e.g. , );

(c) the parallelism with ἐγὼ δέ κ.τ.λ., is more exact;

(d) the popular teaching claimed to be, even in its strictest esoteric form of oral tradition, derived ultimately, not from the words of any human teachers, however primitive, but from the words of God spoken by him to them.

In the case before us our Lord accepts the popular teaching of the time as truly representing the Divine utterance in the giving of the Law, so far as that utterance was then intended to be understood. Them of old time. This can hardly be limited to "the original founders of the Jewish Commonwealth," to use Trench's curiously unbiblical expression ('Syn.,' § 67.). It probably includes all who lived a generation or more before our Lord's time (cf. Weiss). Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment. The substance, according to the popular teaching, of the sixth commandment (; ). This the current form of it (based partly on Le 24:21; .; ) was that murder was not to be committed, and that if it was committed the murderer was to be brought up for trial. Shall be in danger of ( ἔνοχος ἔσται); i.e. in legal danger—legally guilty of a charge which involves the judgment (cf. ). The judgment; i.e. the local Sanhedrin (cf. ), of apparently seven men in a smaller, twenty-three in a larger, town. This answers to "the congregation,'' or "the elders" of the town to which the murderer belonged, before whom he was to be tried (, , ; ).

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 5:21

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:1-48EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:17-48Sermon on the mount: 3. Exceeding righteousness. A teacher who compels the public to look at an unfamiliar truth, the reformer who introduces a new style of goodness, will be misinterpreted just in proportion to the adv…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:17-48The second part of the sermon: the mount of the Beatitudes and Mount Sinai: the new Law and the old. I. CHRIST THE FULFILLER OF THE LAW. 1. He came not to destroy. They must not misunderstand the purpose of his teaching…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 5:21-26The Jewish teachers had taught, that nothing except actual murder was forbidden by the sixth commandment. Thus they explained away its spiritual meaning. Christ showed the full meaning of this commandment; according to…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Sermon on the MountTHE SERMON ON THE MOUNT. Christ having laid down these principles, that Moses and the prophets were still to be their rulers, but that the scribes and Pharisees were to be no longer their rulers, proceeds to expound the…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The sixth commandment.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The stringency of the gospel Law. "Ye have heard," etc. The people generally were acquainted with the Law chiefly through the teaching of the scribes; but the scribes so mixed the traditions of the elders with the Word…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The Christian type of a true fulfilling of the Law: Christ's first illustration. Had the scribes and Pharisees not adulterated in many ways the Law, their righteousness would still have been the observing of the letter…Joseph S. Exell and contributors