Bible Commentary

Matthew 5:24

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:24

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

First. Joined in the Authorized Version and Revised Version to "be reconciled,'' and rightly, since the point is not "the unavoidable, surprising, nay, repellent removal of one's self from the temple" (Meyer), but reconciliation. Be reconciled ( διαλλάγηθι); here only in the New Testament. There seems to be no essential difference between this and καταλλάσσω (vide Thayer).

Parallel passage: , . The question of the relation of the two passages, as regards both language and original connexion, is exceedingly difficult. As to the former, the verbal differences seem to be such as would hardly have been made on purpose, and to be rather due to memory; yet the agreement is too minute to be the result of memory of a Gospel only oral. Perhaps memory of a document best satisfies the conditions. As to the original connexion of the verses, they, especially , can hardly have been spoken twice. Most critics suppose that St. Luke gives them in their proper context; but if so, it is curious that two of his words, ὑπάγεις ἀπήλλαχθαι, seem to recall our preceding verse 24. One word might have been a mere coincidence, but hardly two. It is not likely that these words in verse 24 were derived from Luke, for this supposes a double process in St. Matthew's mind, rejecting them from verse 25 and placing them in verse 24. It is more natural also to regard the first clause of , "As … him," as an expansion of the corresponding clause in our rather than this as a compression of that. This apparent reminiscence in Luke of what is given in our verses 24 and 25a points to the connexion of verses 24-26 in Matthew being original, and to it having been broken by Luke or by the framer of the source that he used.

A further stage in our Lord's warning. A man must not only seek reconciliation with the injured person (verse 23), and that in preference to fulfilling the holiest service (verse 24), but he must do so the more because of the danger of postponing reconciliation. It is noteworthy that our Lord in this verse does not define on whose side the cause of the quarrel lies.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 5:24

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:1-48EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:17-48Sermon on the mount: 3. Exceeding righteousness. A teacher who compels the public to look at an unfamiliar truth, the reformer who introduces a new style of goodness, will be misinterpreted just in proportion to the adv…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:17-48The second part of the sermon: the mount of the Beatitudes and Mount Sinai: the new Law and the old. I. CHRIST THE FULFILLER OF THE LAW. 1. He came not to destroy. They must not misunderstand the purpose of his teaching…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 5:21-26The Jewish teachers had taught, that nothing except actual murder was forbidden by the sixth commandment. Thus they explained away its spiritual meaning. Christ showed the full meaning of this commandment; according to…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Sermon on the MountTHE SERMON ON THE MOUNT. Christ having laid down these principles, that Moses and the prophets were still to be their rulers, but that the scribes and Pharisees were to be no longer their rulers, proceeds to expound the…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The sixth commandment.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The stringency of the gospel Law. "Ye have heard," etc. The people generally were acquainted with the Law chiefly through the teaching of the scribes; but the scribes so mixed the traditions of the elders with the Word…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 5:21-26The Christian type of a true fulfilling of the Law: Christ's first illustration. Had the scribes and Pharisees not adulterated in many ways the Law, their righteousness would still have been the observing of the letter…Joseph S. Exell and contributors