Bible Commentary

Matthew 12:22-32

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:22-32

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost.

Many persons have been tempted to believe that they had committed this dreadful sin, and thereby put themselves beyond the reach of mercy. Correct judgment upon this very important subject may best be attained by considering the more fearfully emphatic words of our Lord in their connection.

I. THE NATURE OF THE BLASPHEMY MAY BE GATHERED FROM THE STORY.

1. Our Lord had wrought a notable miracle.

2. The people were convinced of his Messiahship.

3. But the Pharisees blasphemed.

4. The Heart-searcher exposed their malignity.

(a) Some of the disciples of the Pharisees pretended to exorcise devils. Whether they did so in reality is open to question. Josephus (see 'Ant.,' 7.6. 3; 8.2. 5), Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origen, Tertullian, and other early Fathers are quoted to show that such exorcisms were successfully practised. The sons of Sceva attempted it to their cost (see ). If they only pretended to do it, then our Lord's words here are ironical, but the argument is equally good.

(b) The disciples of the Pharisees professed not to cast out devils by the aid of devils. They did it, or attempted to do it, by the invocation of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

II. THE DIFFICULTIES OF THE SUBJECT MAY NOW BE CONSIDERED.

1. Is not the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost the final rejection of Jesus as the Christ?

2. Yet are there degrees of difficulty in respect to repentance.

3. Is there here any countenance to the doctrine of purgatory?

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 12:22-32

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-50The opposition that our Lord met withJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-45(1) Opposition from his enemies. (a) Conscious and wilful opposition (Matthew 12:1-37). ( α) As regards the sabbath (Matthew 12:1-14). ( β) An interlude. The evangelist sees in our Lord's behaviour the fulfilment of Isa…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-50EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 12:22-30A soul under Satan's power, and led captive by him, is blind in the things of God, and dumb at the throne of grace; sees nothing, and says nothing to the purpose. Satan blinds the eyes by unbelief, and seals up the lips…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Sin against the Holy GhostTHE SIN AGAINST THE HOLY GHOST. In these verses we have, I. Christ's glorious conquest of Satan, in the gracious cure of one who, by the divine permission, was under his power, and in his possession, Matthew 12:22. Here…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:22-37The bathos of detracting blasphemy. In introduction, note the unity of this passage of sixteen verses. While the linking of one portion of the accounts contained in the Gospels to another is very often exceedingly evide…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:22Then was brought. So Westcott and Herr margin, but text, "then they brought," as in Matthew 9:32. Unto him one possessed with a devil, blind (this fact is not mentioned by Luke), and dumb. "The devil had shut up each en…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:22-32The healing of a man blind and dumb, and the consequent blasphemy of the Pharisees. The miracle leads them to the extreme of spiritual opposition. (On the assimilation to our Matthew 12:22-24, found in Matthew 9:32-34,…Joseph S. Exell and contributors