Bible Commentary

Matthew 22:17

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:17

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Tell us therefore. Because you are so truthful and impartial, give us your unprejudiced opinion about the following much-disputed question. These people assume to be simple-minded inquirers, who came to Jesus to have a perplexity resolved.

St. Luke gives their real character, "They sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might take hold of his words." Is it lawful ( ἐ ìξεστι) to give tribute ( κῆνσον, censure) unto Caesar, or not?

The tribute is the poll tax levied by the Romans. Caesar at this time was Tiberius; the title was now applied to the emperors, though its subsequent use was different. By asking concerning the lawfulness of the payment, they do not inquire whether it was expedient or advisable to make it, but whether it was morally and religiously right, consistent with their obligation as subjects of the theocratic kingdom.

Some, as Judas of Galilee (; Josephus, 'Ant.,' 18.1. 1, 6), had resorted to violence in their opposition to the tax; and indeed, the question here put was much debated between opposite parties.

The Pharisees were strongly opposed to foreign domination, and thought it derogatory and sacrilegious for the people of Jehovah to pay impost to a foreign and heathen authority. The Herodians, on the other hand, submitted without reserve to the supremacy of Rome, and, for political reasons, silenced all nationalist and ultra-patriotic feeling.

By putting this question, the disputants thought to force Christ into a dilemma, where he must answer directly "Yes" or "No," and where, whichever reply he made, he would equally offend one or other of the parties into which the state was divided.

If he affirmed the lawfulness of the tax, he would lose his popularity with the mass of the people, as one who disowned the sovereignty of Jehovah, and would give the death blow to his own claims as Messiah-King.

If he garb a negative reply, he would be deemed an enemy of Rome and a promoter of seditious views, and be liable to be handed over to the civil power for the punishment of disaffection and treason (see ).

They falsely brought this charge against him before Pilate ().

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 22:17

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…The Question Respecting TributeMatthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryTribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22The Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question Respecting TributeTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Second attack: The question concerning the tribute to Caesar. (Mark 12:13-17; Luke 20:20-26.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The question of tribute. I. THE TEMPTATION. 1. The coalition. The Pharisees were greatly offended. They as well as the chief priests (Matthew 21:45) perceived that these parables were spoken of them. Their conscience sm…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Tribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributors