Bible Commentary

Matthew 22:21

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:21

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Caesar's. They are constrained to answer that the coin bears the effigy of the Roman emperor. Render ( ἀπο ìδοτε, give back, as a due) therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's ( τα Ì Και ìσαρος).

Rabbinism ruled that the right of coinage appertained to the ruler of a state, and was a proof of de facto government, which it was unlawful to resist. The current coin, which they used in their daily transactions, showed that the Jews were no longer independent, but set under and acquiescing in a foreign domination.

Being subjects of Caesar, it was their duty to submit to his demands, and to pay the taxes which he had a right to levy. This was an answer to the insidious question propounded. Christ does not take either side in the controversy; he makes no question of the mutual rights of conquered and conquerors; he utters no aspiration for the recovery of independence; he uses facts as they are, and points to habitual practice as a sufficient solution of the difficulty.

No reply could be wiser or simpler. Herein he gives a lesson for all time. No plea of religion can hold good against obedience to lawful authority. "Render to all their dues," says St. Paul (): "tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour."

The things that are God's; τα Ì τοῦ Θεοῦ. The things of God arc ourselves—our life, powers, faculties, means; to use these in God's service is our duty and our privilege. There need be no conflict between religion and politics, Church and state.

Let a citizen do his duty to God, and he will find his obligations to the civil power are coincident and harmonious. Let the state respect the rights of God and of conscience, and there will he no collision between itself and the Church, but both will peaceably cooperate for the good of the community.

Had the Jews rendered to God his dues, they would never have been reduced to their present state of subjection and debasement; would never have had to pay tribute to a foreign nation.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 22:21

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…The Question Respecting TributeMatthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryTribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22The Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question Respecting TributeTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Second attack: The question concerning the tribute to Caesar. (Mark 12:13-17; Luke 20:20-26.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The question of tribute. I. THE TEMPTATION. 1. The coalition. The Pharisees were greatly offended. They as well as the chief priests (Matthew 21:45) perceived that these parables were spoken of them. Their conscience sm…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Tribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributors