Bible Commentary

Matthew 22:15

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Purposed entanglements.

As foolish a thing as was ever attempted was trying to entangle Jesus in talk. A difficult business enough if Jesus had been only a wise prophet teacher. A hopeless business, seeing that Jesus was the Son of God, and read thoughts and hearts, and "knew what was in man." We are to understand that different parties agreed to set several traps for Jesus, hoping to catch him in one or other of them. Popular feeling was too strongly in his favour for his enemies to venture upon anything like an open arrest. "All the previous attempts had been to discredit Jesus as a religious Teacher; the present is an attempt to expose him to the hostility of the Roman government." It would suit the purpose of the Sanhedrin if they could make him say something disloyal, so that the Romans would deal with him.

I. ENTANGLEMENTS REVEALING THOSE WHO ATTEMPTED THEM. This opens an interesting character study. It brings before us the shifts to which men resort who will not yield themselves to arguments and persuasions they are determined not to admit. These men were resolved not to accept Christ as Messiah. They were resolved to discredit his claims somehow, and destroy him, if only they could get a chance. They were untrue to their better selves, and so they had to be ruled by their baser selves; and thus they were put upon all sorts of mean and miserable shifts and schemes. Yet they did not see how they were degrading themselves. Honourable men were self-deluded into acting dishonourably. These men are shown up. They were not really jealous for the honour of God: it was fear for their own place and influence that made them so mean and base. The upright man wants no shifts, and takes no advantage of his brother.

II. ENTANGLEMENTS REVEALING HIM WHO WAS TO BE ENTANGLED. Our Lord felt no sort of alarm when, with imposing authority, the deputation from the Sanhedrin made its demands. Our Lord showed no fear or anxiety when the schemers presented their subtle and malicious question. And he made no mistake; he gave the entanglers no sort of opportunity. He was proof against their wiles. His simplicity tested their guilefulness. His wisdom saw through their schemes.—R.T.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 22:15

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…The Question Respecting TributeMatthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe question of tribute. I. THE TEMPTATION. 1. The coalition. The Pharisees were greatly offended. They as well as the chief priests (Matthew 21:45) perceived that these parables were spoken of them. Their conscience sm…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryTribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22The Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question Respecting TributeTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Second attack: The question concerning the tribute to Caesar. (Mark 12:13-17; Luke 20:20-26.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The question of tribute. I. THE TEMPTATION. 1. The coalition. The Pharisees were greatly offended. They as well as the chief priests (Matthew 21:45) perceived that these parables were spoken of them. Their conscience sm…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Tribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15Then went the Pharisees. After they had heard the parables, and were for the time silenced, they departed from the public courts of the temple, and betook themselves to the hall of the Sanhedrin, that they might plot so…Joseph S. Exell and contributors