Bible Commentary

Matthew 24:22

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:22

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Except these days should be shortened ( ἐκολοβω ìθησαν, had been shortened). In the midst of wrath God thinks on mercy. He providentially ordained that the days of vengeance should not be indefinitely prolonged; the siege was practically of short duration, the country was not wholly overrun and desolated.

The natural causes that combined to produce this shortening of the siege have been recounted by commentators. These were—the divided counsels of the Jews themselves, the voluntary surrender of parts of the fortifications, the fierce factions in the city, the destruction of magazines of provisions by calamitous fire, the suddenness of the arrival of Titus, and the fact that the walls had never been strengthened, as Herod Agrippa had intended.

There should no flesh be saved; i.e. the whole Jewish nation would have been annihilated. For the elect's sake. At the intercession of the escaped Christians, who offered up unceasing prayer for their brethren and countrymen, God lessened the duration of the calamities.

"The supplication of a righteous man availeth much in its working" (). Ten righteous would have saved Sodom; Lot's intercession did preserve Zoar (comp. ; ; ).

Some, not so suitably, explain "the elect" to be those Jews who should hereafter turn to the Lord; or the elect seed, "beloved for the fathers'sake" (). We may well believe that the local tribulations, such as are intimated by Daniel and Christ, and their limitation in time, are a picture of what shall happen in the last days, the intermediate fulfilment being the prelude of the final accomplishment.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 24:22

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:1-51PROPHECY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM, AND OF THE TIMES OF THE END. (Mark 13:1-37; Luke 21:5-36.) There is no reason to think, with Olshauson, that St. Matthew or his editor has considerably amplified the original di…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:1-51EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 24:4-28The disciples had asked concerning the times, When these things should be? Christ gave them no answer to that; but they had also asked, What shall be the sign? This question he answers fully. The prophecy first respects…Matthew HenrycommentaryAwful PredictionsAWFUL PREDICTIONS. The disciples had asked concerning the times, When shall these things be? Christ gives them no answer to that, after what number of days and years his prediction should be accomplished, for it is not…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:4-41The first portion of the great prophecy.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:15-28Predictions of the nearer end: The destruction of Jerusalem. I. THE WARNINGS OF THE COMING END. 1. The sign. The Lord returns to the first question of the disciples, "When shall these things be?" His eye had been lookin…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 24:15-28Salutary warnings. Having announced the signs of his advent, first for the destruction of the Jewish antichrist, and secondly for that of its Gentile counterpart, Christ gives to his disciples salutary warnings suited t…Joseph S. Exell and contributors