Bible Commentary

John 21:15

The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

When therefore they had breakfasted, Jesus saith to Simon Peter. His full name and Christ-given appellation is in the mind of the evangelist; but he, with marked emphasis, shows that our Lord went back to his relations with Simon before the latter's first introduction to him (see , etc.

), and recalls the attitude Christ had taken to Simon on more than one memorable occasion (; ). On two of these occasions the simple humanity of the apostle was the basis on which the Lord proceeded to confer upon him the high official designation.

The grace of God, in the first instance, selected Simon of Jonah to be a rock. In the second, "not flesh and blood," but the Father's grace, revealed the mystery of the Divine Sonship to him, and won the name of Peter.

In the third, the utter weakness of Simon's own flesh reveals the power of the prayer of Jesus for him, so that he might ultimately convert his brethren; and now "Simon" is reinstated after his fall into his apostolic office.

Simon, son of Jona—or, John £ (see , note)—lovest thou me more than these? i.e. more than these other disciples love me? Thou hast seen more of my compassion, farther into my heart, deeper into my Person, my position, and my work, than they have done; thou hast dared again and again to ask for higher service and more conspicuous distinction.

Thou hast made louder protestations than any of these of thine unworthiness to serve me, and in the deep consciousness of humiliation thou hast been more emphatic than any of them in refusing grace which thou thoughtest it might dishonor me to give.

Thou didst indeed say, "Though all men should be offended at me or should deny me," thou wouldst never be offended and never deny me. "Dost thou love me more than they do?" There is no positive reference to the denial and fall of Peter; but the implication and suggestion cannot be hidden, though Hengstenberg and others fail to appreciate it.

The circumstance that Peter was "grieved" because the Lord put this question to him a third time makes the reference very little less than explicit. The real significance of the narrative is the reinstitution of Peter in the position of importance he had filled throughout, and an indication of the nature and quality of that service.

In Simon's reply, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee, three things are very noticeable.

Recommended reading

More for John 21:15

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25John 21:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25John 21:1-25 · The Pulpit Commentary3. The epilogue, answering to the prologue. The post-resurrection life corresponds with the pre-incarnate energy of the Logos. 1. Long and sustained controversy has prevailed on the question of the authenticity and apos…Matthew Henry on John 21:15-19John 21:15-19 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryOur Lord addressed Peter by his original name, as if he had forfeited that of Peter through his denying him. He now answered, Thou knowest that I love thee; but without professing to love Jesus more than others. We must…Christ's Discourse with PeterJohn 21:15-19 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCHRIST'S DISCOURSE WITH PETER. We have here Christ's discourse with Peter after dinner, so much of it as relates to himself, in which, I. He examines his love to him, and gives him a charge concerning his flock, John 21…The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15John 21:15 · The Pulpit Commentary"Lovest thou me?" To comprehend this interview and dialogue, it is necessary to look at preceding circumstances. In a conversation which took place before our Lord's betrayal, Peter had made the most ardent professions…The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15-19John 21:15-19 · The Pulpit Commentary(2) The revelations to be made in the services dictated by love and issuing in martyrdom. The confession made by Simon Peter, and the charge given to him.
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-253. The epilogue, answering to the prologue. The post-resurrection life corresponds with the pre-incarnate energy of the Logos. 1. Long and sustained controversy has prevailed on the question of the authenticity and apos…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on John 21:15-19Our Lord addressed Peter by his original name, as if he had forfeited that of Peter through his denying him. He now answered, Thou knowest that I love thee; but without professing to love Jesus more than others. We must…Matthew HenrycommentaryChrist's Discourse with PeterCHRIST'S DISCOURSE WITH PETER. We have here Christ's discourse with Peter after dinner, so much of it as relates to himself, in which, I. He examines his love to him, and gives him a charge concerning his flock, John 21…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15-19(2) The revelations to be made in the services dictated by love and issuing in martyrdom. The confession made by Simon Peter, and the charge given to him.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15-17The restoration of Peter. Though the Lord had already appeared to his disciple (Luke 24:34; 1 Corinthians 15:5), he had not yet formally restored him to the place he had forfeited by his three denials. I. THE SOLEMN QUE…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15"Lovest thou me?" To comprehend this interview and dialogue, it is necessary to look at preceding circumstances. In a conversation which took place before our Lord's betrayal, Peter had made the most ardent professions…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:15-17The pastoral office. Notice— I. THE LOVE REQUIRED. 1. In some of its leading features. 2. In its supreme importance. (a) As the test of his Christian character. The possession or non-possession of love decides at once h…Joseph S. Exell and contributors