Bible Commentary

Acts 25:1-16

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-16

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The enlightened, the unenlightened, and the great Overruler.

This piece of sacred history suggests—

I. THAT SOMETIMES THE BLACKEST DEEDS LIE AT THE DOOR OF THE ENLIGHTENED. Who more enlightened than these Jews, so far as outward privileges were concerned? They had the fullest opportunity of knowing the truth and of acting uprightly. They "had the mind" of God; revelation had shone on their path with full, strong light. Yet we find them (, ) endeavoring to get Paul into their power, that they might deliberately assassinate him. And we again find them fiercely preferring charges against him which they could not prove (). And again we find them demanding judgment against him when no crime had been established (). In how dark a light does their action appear! The men that would have shuddered at a small and venial impropriety or omission do not scruple to do rank injustice, to commit murder! They were neither the first nor the last to make this fatal mistake (; ). There have been, and are, many souls who have accounted themselves, and have been reckoned by others, peculiarly holy, at whose door lie the most serious sins, who are living lives utterly evil in God's sight, and who will awake to condemnation and retribution at the last (, ).

II. THAT SOMETIMES THE UNENLIGHTENED EXHIBIT ADMIRABLE VIRTUES. The Roman had been far less favored than the Jew in the great matter of religious privilege. Not unto him had been "committed the oracles of God;" not to him had psalmists sung and prophets prophesied. Yet we find the Roman sometimes exhibiting virtue of an excellent order. We find this here. Festus, indeed, desired to "do the Jews a pleasure" (). What governor would not? But he did not commit any act of illegality or injustice in order to do this, and we find him on two occasions resolutely declining to yield to pressure when he could not do so without departing from fairness (, , , ). This worthiness of behavior may have been due to respect for law rather than regard for individual right; but it was honorable and excellent, as far as it went. The self-control it indicates contrasts strongly with the abandonment to passionate hatred which disgraced the Jews. Virtue is sometimes found unassociated with religion.

(a) unsatisfactory to God in its nature, and it is

(b) uncertain in its duration. All moral excellency should be built on spiritual convictions. Then, and then only, is it pleasing to God and certain to endure.

III. THAT DIVINE PROVIDENCE IS PRESIDING OVER ALL EVENTS. Had Festus, "willing to do the Jews a pleasure," consented to Paul's being brought to Jerusalem (), he would have fallen a victim to their murderous machinations. Then the Church of Christ would never have had some of those Epistles which now enrich our sacred literature, and which we could ill spare from the sacred volume. But "his hour was not yet come"—his hour of martyrdom, his hour of holy triumph, his hour of deliverance and redemption. "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints," and vainly is the persecutor's arm uplifted if God does not mean that the blow shall fail. So with all events. The Divine Overruler is "shaping the ends" of all things, directing the course and tracing the bound of our activities, compelling even the wrath of man to praise him, conducting all things to a rightful and blessed issue.—C.

Recommended reading

More for Acts 25:1-16

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Acts 25:1-12Acts 25:1-12 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentarySee how restless malice is. Persecutors deem it a peculiar favour to have their malice gratified. Preaching Christ, the end of the law, was no offence against the law. In suffering times the prudence of the Lord's peopl…Paul Arraigned before Festus; Paul's Fourth Defence; Paul Appeals to CæsarActs 25:1-12 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BiblePAUL ARRAIGNED BEFORE FESTUS; PAUL'S FOURTH DEFENCE; PAUL APPEALS TO CÆSAR. We commonly say, "New lords, new laws, new customs;" but here was a new governor, and yet Paul had the same treatment from him that he had from…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-27Acts 25:1-27 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSTIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1Acts 25:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryFoetus therefore having come for now when Foetus was come, A.V.; went up for he ascended, A.V.; to Jerusalem from Casarea for from Caesarea to Jerusalem, A.V. The province ( ἐπαρχία); above, Acts 23:1-35. 34. After th…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-12Acts 25:1-12 · The Pulpit CommentaryPersistent hatred. There is a bitterness and a dogged persistency in the enmity of an Oriental, and an inextinguishable thirst for revenge, which are unlike anything we know of among ourselves. Some knowledge and percep…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-12Acts 25:1-12 · The Pulpit CommentaryTenacity in right. Paul is brought before a fresh judge. He defends the principles of duty and right in the same spirit as before, with perfect boldness, as the state of the matter demands, and at the same time with due…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 25:1-12See how restless malice is. Persecutors deem it a peculiar favour to have their malice gratified. Preaching Christ, the end of the law, was no offence against the law. In suffering times the prudence of the Lord's peopl…Matthew HenrycommentaryPaul Arraigned before Festus; Paul's Fourth Defence; Paul Appeals to CæsarPAUL ARRAIGNED BEFORE FESTUS; PAUL'S FOURTH DEFENCE; PAUL APPEALS TO CÆSAR. We commonly say, "New lords, new laws, new customs;" but here was a new governor, and yet Paul had the same treatment from him that he had from…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-27EXPOSTIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1Foetus therefore having come for now when Foetus was come, A.V.; went up for he ascended, A.V.; to Jerusalem from Casarea for from Caesarea to Jerusalem, A.V. The province ( ἐπαρχία); above, Acts 23:1-35. 34. After th…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-12Tenacity in right. Paul is brought before a fresh judge. He defends the principles of duty and right in the same spirit as before, with perfect boldness, as the state of the matter demands, and at the same time with due…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-12Persistent hatred. There is a bitterness and a dogged persistency in the enmity of an Oriental, and an inextinguishable thirst for revenge, which are unlike anything we know of among ourselves. Some knowledge and percep…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:1-12The way opened to Rome. I. A WAY WHICH HAD TO BE CUT THROUGH JEWISH CRAFT AND MALICE on the one hand, and ROMAN INDIFFERENCE AND AVARICE on the other. Festers: a true heathen, ignorant, worldly, ready to use power for s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 25:2And for then, A.V.; chief priests for high priest, A.V. and T.R.; principal men for chief, A.V.; and they besought for and besought, A.V. Chief priests; as in Acts 25:15 and Acts 22:30. But the reading of the T.R., "the…Joseph S. Exell and contributors