Bible Commentary

Acts 26:23

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:23

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

How that the Christ must for that Christ should, A.V.; how that he first by the resurrection of the dead should proclaim for that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should show, A.

V.; both to for unto, A.V. and T.R. How that ( ει)); see , note. Must suffer; ταθητός only here and in profane Greek writers. The exact meaning of παθητός is "liable to suffering," just as θνητός (from θνήσκω) means "liable to death," i.

e. mortal. But just as θνητός in use comes to mean "one who must die," so παθητός means "one who must suffer;" and so we read in , οὐχὶ ἔδει παθεῖν τὸν χριστὸν καὶ εἰσελθεῖν εἰς τὴν δόξαν αὑτοῦ; "Ought not Christ to have suffered," etc.?

And so again in (T.R.), ἔδει παθεῖν τὸν χριστὸν καὶ ἀναστῆναι ἐκ νεκρῶν, "It behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead," where the turn of thought is exactly the same as here.

The Vulgate renders it by passibilis. The Fathers contrast the state of Christ in glory with his state in the flesh by the words ἀπαθής and παθητός, "impassible" and "passible." That he first by the resurrection of the dead should proclaim, etc.

Most commentators, from Chrysostom downwards, connect the first with the resurrection. "First from the resurrection," equal to πρωτότοκος ἐκ τῶν νεκρῶν (). As Meyer truly says, "The chief stress of this sentence lies on πρῶτος ἐξ ἀναστάσεως."

The A.V. gives the sense by a periphrasis; only it must be well understood that it was especially by being the first to rise, and so to bring life and immortality to light, that Christ showed light to the people.

The words may, of course, be construed as the R.V. does, but such a rendering is not in accordance with the spirit of the passage or the analogy of other passages. Christ was the first rise, and he will be followed by them that are his.

But it is not true to say that he was the first to give light to Jews and Gentiles, and will be followed by others doing the same. (For the sentiment, setup. .) Note on the whole the enormous stress laid by St.

Paul on the fulfillment of prophecy as a proof of the truth of the gospel, following therein our Lord himself (, , , ).

Recommended reading

More for Acts 26:23

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe apostolic defense in the presence of Festus and Agrippa. I. THE BEARING OF THE MAN. Dignity, gentleness, courtesy—a true Christian gentleman. II. THE APPEAL TO FACTS. The incontrovertible evidence. "Once I was a per…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-26Acts 26:1-26 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe apology. We are struck with a contrast between the conduct of our Lord when he stood before the bar of Caiaphas and of Pontius Pilate, and that of St. Paul when he was brought before Festus and Agrippa. It is writte…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryPaul before Festus and Agrippa. His address may be divided as follows:— I. THE REMARKABLE STORY OF HIS LIFE. (Acts 26:1-18.) 1. His life in Judaism. He had been brought up, as all knew, in the strictest sect of his reli…Matthew Henry on Acts 26:12-23Acts 26:12-23 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryPaul was made a Christian by Divine power; by a revelation of Christ both to him and in him; when in the full career of his sin. He was made a minister by Divine authority: the same Jesus who appeared to him in that glo…Paul's Fifth DefenceActs 26:12-23 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BiblePAUL'S FIFTH DEFENCE. All who believe a God, and have a reverence for his sovereignty, must acknowledge that those who speak and act by his direction, and by warrant from him, are not to be opposed; for that is fighting…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Paul before Festus and Agrippa. His address may be divided as follows:— I. THE REMARKABLE STORY OF HIS LIFE. (Acts 26:1-18.) 1. His life in Judaism. He had been brought up, as all knew, in the strictest sect of his reli…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-26The apology. We are struck with a contrast between the conduct of our Lord when he stood before the bar of Caiaphas and of Pontius Pilate, and that of St. Paul when he was brought before Festus and Agrippa. It is writte…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32The apostolic defense in the presence of Festus and Agrippa. I. THE BEARING OF THE MAN. Dignity, gentleness, courtesy—a true Christian gentleman. II. THE APPEAL TO FACTS. The incontrovertible evidence. "Once I was a per…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 26:12-23Paul was made a Christian by Divine power; by a revelation of Christ both to him and in him; when in the full career of his sin. He was made a minister by Divine authority: the same Jesus who appeared to him in that glo…Matthew HenrycommentaryPaul's Fifth DefencePAUL'S FIFTH DEFENCE. All who believe a God, and have a reverence for his sovereignty, must acknowledge that those who speak and act by his direction, and by warrant from him, are not to be opposed; for that is fighting…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:20-23The penalty and the resources of a devoted life. There is no trace of egotism, in the offensive sense of the word, in this simple sketch of the apostle's course. He is simply telling the truth concerning himself out of…Joseph S. Exell and contributorssermonThe Almost Persuaded” — T. DeWitt Talmage (1800s)T. DeWitt Talmage (1800s)