Bible Commentary

Jude 1:9

The Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:9

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

An angelic example for human imitation.

Jude then refers to an extraordinary incident not recorded in Scripture, but evidently contained in the old Jewish traditions respecting a contest of Michael the archangel with the devil.

I. THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL—WHO WAS HE?

1. He appears as "one of the chief princes" who stood up for God's people against the Persians ().

2. He appears as fighting. "Michael and his angels" against the devil and his angels ().

3. He is probably the archangel whose voice is to be heard at the period of our Lord's descent to judgment. (.)

4. He is probably at the head of the good angels, as the devil is represented as at the head of the evil angels.

5. High as he is in rank, he is most active in dutiful service to God.

II. THE STRIFE BETWEEN MICHAEL AND THE DEVIL. "But Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing judgment."

1. The incident here referred to occurred necessarily after Moses' death.

2. The dispute did not arise, as some think, from the effort of type devil to prevent the concealment of the body of Moses, whom God buried that no man might know the place of his sepulture. The reason usually assigned for the secrecy of the burial is that the Israelites might have worshipped the body of their great lawgiver. But there is no evidence that the Israelites ever at any time showed a disposition to worship dead men's bones. Their inclination was rather to worship the powers of nature.

3. An ingenious and plausible explanation has been given of this strife in this wise.

(a) Sin and holiness must necessarily come into conflict wherever they encounter each other.

(b) Michael overcomes the devil. "He that is for us is far greater than all they that be against us."

III. THE DEPORTMENT OF MICHAEL IN THIS STRIFE WITH THE DEVIL. "He durst not bring against him a railing judgment, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."

1. It would have been inconsistent with angelical perfection to rail against the devil.

2. There is no cowardice in Michael not daring to sin.

3. What is wrong for angels cannot be right for men to do.

4. Michael left the decision of the strife absolutely in God's hands.

5. God's power restrains that of the devil.

6. The thought that we have a God into whose hands we may commit our cause ought to make us patient, forbearing, and forgiving.—T.C.

Recommended reading

More for Jude 1:9

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:1-25Jude 1:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe Letter. I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Address. 2. Salutation. "Mercy unto you and peace and love be multiplied." The first word of salutation points to their being regarded under troublous conditions. The second word of salut…The Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:5-16Jude 1:5-16 · The Pulpit CommentaryHere are reasons for resisting evil men drawn from examples of the Divine anger against others. As a scribe well-instructed, Jude brings from the treasures of Old Testament truth suitable illustrations to inspire believ…Matthew Henry on Jude 1:8-16Jude 1:8-16 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryFalse teachers are dreamers; they greatly defile and grievously wound the soul. These teachers are of a disturbed mind and a seditious spirit; forgetting that the powers that be, are ordained of God, Ro 13:1. As to the…Contumacious Professors. (a. d. 66.)Jude 1:8-15 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCONTUMACIOUS PROFESSORS. (A. D. 66.) The apostle here exhibits a charge against deceivers who were now seducing the disciples of Christ from the profession and practice of his holy religion. He calls them filthy dreamer…The Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:8-11Jude 1:8-11 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe mutual dependence of belief and life. "Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh," etc. Religion is the strength and security of morality. Morality is the outcome and flower of religion. There must be som…The Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:9Jude 1:9 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe irreverent and unbridled speech of these "filthy dreamers" is now contrasted with the self-restraint of one of the "dignities" of the angelic world. The point of the contrast is sufficiently clear. The incident itse…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:1-25The Letter. I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Address. 2. Salutation. "Mercy unto you and peace and love be multiplied." The first word of salutation points to their being regarded under troublous conditions. The second word of salut…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:5-16Here are reasons for resisting evil men drawn from examples of the Divine anger against others. As a scribe well-instructed, Jude brings from the treasures of Old Testament truth suitable illustrations to inspire believ…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Jude 1:8-16False teachers are dreamers; they greatly defile and grievously wound the soul. These teachers are of a disturbed mind and a seditious spirit; forgetting that the powers that be, are ordained of God, Ro 13:1. As to the…Matthew HenrycommentaryContumacious Professors. (a. d. 66.)CONTUMACIOUS PROFESSORS. (A. D. 66.) The apostle here exhibits a charge against deceivers who were now seducing the disciples of Christ from the profession and practice of his holy religion. He calls them filthy dreamer…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:8-11The mutual dependence of belief and life. "Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh," etc. Religion is the strength and security of morality. Morality is the outcome and flower of religion. There must be som…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jude 1:9The irreverent and unbridled speech of these "filthy dreamers" is now contrasted with the self-restraint of one of the "dignities" of the angelic world. The point of the contrast is sufficiently clear. The incident itse…Joseph S. Exell and contributors