Third attack: The Sadducees and the resurrection. (Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40.
Bible Commentary
Matthew 22:23-33
The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33
The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain
Recommended reading
More for Matthew 22:23-33
Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.
Other commentaries
The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Matthew Henry on Matthew 22:23-33Matthew 22:23-33 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe doctrines of Christ displeased the infidel Sadducees, as well as the Pharisees and Herodians. He carried the great truths of the resurrection and a future state, further than they had yet been reveled. There is no a…The Question Respecting MarriageMatthew 22:23-33 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING MARRIAGE. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33Matthew 22:23-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23Matthew 22:23 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe same day; on that day. This is still the Tuesday in the Holy Week. The Sadducees. There is no definite article here in the original. Which say; οἱλε Ìγοντες. Many good manuscripts and some modern editors (Laehmann,…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:23-33The doctrines of Christ displeased the infidel Sadducees, as well as the Pharisees and Herodians. He carried the great truths of the resurrection and a future state, further than they had yet been reveled. There is no a…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question Respecting MarriageTHE QUESTION RESPECTING MARRIAGE. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23Denial of resurrection as a sign of mental mood. "The Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection." It does not appear how their question helped the entanglement scheme. Possibly the design was to secure a statem…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23The same day; on that day. This is still the Tuesday in the Holy Week. The Sadducees. There is no definite article here in the original. Which say; οἱλε Ìγοντες. Many good manuscripts and some modern editors (Laehmann,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The Sadducees. I. THEIR CASE OF CASUISTRY. 1. Their doctrine. They held that there was no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit (Acts 23:8). Some of them now came to Christ, asserting their unbelief. They had not hith…Joseph S. Exell and contributors